FAIR
Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting
130 W. 25th Street New York, NY 10001
January 15, 1999
ACTION ALERT:
Broadcast Outlets Should Cover Majority Leader's Public Scandal
CNN, New York Times Cover The Story,
but Network News Outlets Still Silent on Lott's Racist Connections
Following a series of FAIR press releases and
syndicated columnists covering Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott's
associations with the CCC (Council of Conservative Citizens),
CNN's Inside Politics presented a thorough summary of the scandal on
January 13.
The very next day, the New York Times' John Kifner
focuses considerable attention on Lott's lies about his connections
to, and knowledge of, the CCC. ("Lott,
and Shadow of a Pro-White Group.") Kifner was interviewed
by MSNBC as well.
Lott's record is clear: He has misled the public,
and the media, through his spokesman. When reporters raised questions
about Sen. Lott's ties to the Council of Conservative Citizens
(CCC), Lott's press secretary, John Czwartacki, told the L.A.
Times (12/13/98) that Lott "vaguely" remembered speaking
to the group "over a decade ago" before he was a senator.
He added that Lott "doesn't consider himself a member. Nor
does he have first-hand familiarity or knowledge of their views."
Here's what's known:
- 1997: Lott holds a private meeting
with the CCC in his DC office
- 1997: Lott endorsement of the CCC is
circulated in the group's literature
- 1995: Lott addresses the Mississippi
chapter of the CCC
- 1992: Lott praises the group as keynote
speaker at the CCC's national convention
- 1991: Lott addreses the Mississippi
chapter of the CCC
- 1989: Lott appears in CCC publication
Citizens Informer with his uncle, a CCC executive, and cousin,
a member
- 1990-1998: The Citizens Informer publishes
Senator Lott's column
Though Lott now repudiates the CCC, serious questions
remain unanswered. Given his prominent role in the impeachment
hearings, Lott will undoubtedly be fielding questions from the
news media. Those pursuing questions of the hypocrisy of elected
officials should question Lott about his own past, especially
given his evasiveness on the issue.