"....you may ask why so many of my articles
are intertwined with the Jewish approach to eugenics and why
I use them over and over again to make numerous points about
human behavior AND about the need for nationalism. First, Jews
are one of the few identifiable groups (actually, the the Ashkenazi
Jews specifically) who have practiced eugenics with tenacious
success that has raised their intelligence to a remarkably high
level, along with increasing group cohesiveness leading to extreme
ethnocentrism or xenophobia. Several issues arise from this
achievement. First, because of the form of their genetic
selection process, they have primarily developed their verbal
skills, making them uniquely adept at manipulation, deception,
propaganda, academics, the media, etc. This would not normally
be a problem, except that they have managed with this verbal
skill to control politics and national policy, while those with
other skills have built of the technological foundations of
a great nations in Europe and America. That is, the Jewish contribution
may not have been very great or even negative, as their accumulation
of far greater wealth than any other ethnic group has to do
with their abilities in manipulation of other people through
the power of words rather than through constructing or building
industry. Skilled craftsmen and technicians are as important
as lawyers, politicians, academics or journalists; but the rewards
have gone to the elite who have the power of the word over the
skill of the craftsmen.
Second, Jews have been at the forefront of
promoting multiculturalism, diversity, globalism, etc., while
trying to block nationalism, while at the same time embracing
Zionism. This faction of Jews, leftover from the days of Communism
have maintained their presence in academics, the media and politics
and are the primary stumbling block to other ethnic groups trying
to form their own cohesive nationhood based on their genetic
similarity, just like the Jews have done in Israel. My objection
to Jewish influence in America therefore is strictly political
and aimed at the Jewish left, not the empirical Jewish right,
and their are many of them who reject multiculturalism and genetic
assimilation of incompatible peoples. These Jews I embrace,
the few that there are on the side of eugenics and human advancement."
" After reading two very critical reviews
of Stephen J. Gould et al.'s determination to subvert an empirical
approach to scientific reviews of race, evolution and eugenics,
I decided to combine an earlier post of rebuttals to Gouldian
pseudoscience with two very recent critiques by Kevin MacDonald
and Richard Dawkins, along with some older essays and comments
by other experts. However, only MacDonald has formulated a hypothesis
as to why Gouldian misinformation is so predominant in the popular
press. This critique of Gould et al. is from The Culture of
Critique, but his two prior works must also be read to fully
understand the formulations that MacDonald uses to explain Gould's
ability at duplicity, self-deception and propaganda: A People
That Shall Dwell Alone: Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy
(1995) and Separation and Its Discontents: Toward an Evolutionary
Theory of Anti-Semitism (1998)."
