|
|
Astin, A. E. (1993)
"Emerging Lessons On How Faculty Develop As Teachers," In M. Weimer, ed.,
Faculty As Teachers: Taking Stock Of What We Know (pp. 9-11). University
Park, PA: National Center
on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, And Assessment.
Chism, N. (1993) How
Faculty Develop Teaching Expertise. In M. Weimer, ed., Faculty As Teachers:
Taking Stock Of What We Know (pp. 33-36).
University Park,
PA: National Center
On Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, And Assessment.
Donald, J. (1995)
"Disciplinary Differences in Knowledge Validation," in N. Hativa and M.
Marinovich, eds., Disciplinary Differences in Teaching and Learning:
Implications for Practice, Vol. 64 New Directions For Teaching & Learning
series. Jossey-Bass
Fox, D. (1983). "Personal
Theories Of Teaching," Studies In Higher Education, 8: 151-163.
Grasha, A.F. (1996)
Teaching with Style. Alliance Publishers
Gow, L., & Kember, D.
(1993) "Conceptions Of Teaching And Their Relationship To Student Learning."
BJEP, 63: 20-33.
Hativa, N. and P.
Goodyear. (forthcoming) Teacher Knowledge, Thinking and Beliefs in Higher
Education. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kagan, D. (1992)
"Implications Of Research On Teacher Belief." Educational Psychologist,
27: 65-90.
Kember, D., & Gow, L.
(1994) "Orientations To Teaching And Their Effect on The Quality Of Student
Learning. "Journal Of Higher Education, 65: 58-74.
Kember, D. (1997). "A
Reconceptualization of the Research into University Academics' Conceptions of
Teaching." Learning And Instruction, 7: 255-285.
Lewis, K.G. (1988) Face
To Face, A Sourcebook Of Individual Consultation Techniques For
Faculty/Instructional Developers: New Forums Press. See especially pages
167-171.
McKeachie, W. J. (1997)
"Wanting To Be A Good Teacher: What Have We Learned to Date?" In J. L. Bass, ed.,
Teaching Well And Liking It: Motivating Faculty To Teach Effectively,
Baltimore,
MD: The Johns
Hopkins
University
Press.
Menges, R. J. & Rando, W.
C. (1989) "What Are Your Assumptions? Improving Instruction by Examining
Theories." College Teaching, 37: 54-60.
Mertz, N. & McNeely, S. R.
(1990) "How Professors 'Learn' To Teach: Teacher Cognitions, Teaching Paradigms
And Higher Education." Paper Presented To the Annual Meeting of The American
Educational Research Association, Boston. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service
No. ED320471).
Murray, H. (1997)
"Effective Teaching Behaviors in The College Classroom," in R.P. Perry And J.C.
Smart, eds., Effective Teaching In Higher Education. NY: Agathon Press.
Prosser, M. and K.
Trigwell. (1998) Understanding Learning And Teaching: The Experience In
Higher Education. Open University Press.
How can
university teachers improve the quality of student learning? Prosser and
Trigwell argue that the answer lies in determining how students perceive their
unique learning situations. In doing so they draw upon the considerable body of
educational research into student learning in higher education which has been
developed and published over the past three decades; and they enable university
teachers to research and improve their own teaching.
Ramsden, P. (1992)
Learning To Teach In Higher Education. New York: Routledge.
Ross, E. W., et al. (1992)
Teacher Personal Theorizing. State
University
Of New York Press.
Singer, E.R. (1996)
"Espoused Teaching Paradigms Of College Faculty." Research In Higher
Education, 37: 659-679.
This
study addresses the following questions:
·
What Teaching
Paradigms Do Faculty Members Espouse In Their Teaching Practices?
·
What Factors
Influence The Espoused Teaching Paradigms Of Teaching Faculty?
·
What Is The
Relationship Between The Espoused Teaching Paradigms Of College Faculty And The
Instructional Behaviors They Use In Their Learning Practice?"
Timpson, W. and P.
Bendel-Simso. (1996) Concepts And Choices For Teaching: Meeting The
Challenges In Higher Education. Madison,
WI: Magna.
Instructors face many choices -- and their decisions and actions should be based
on certain concepts. Yet many instructors don't know enough about those concepts
and the educational research and theories behind them.
Concepts And Choices For Teaching
offers the best of what is available in the realm of teaching and learning, both
theoretical and practical, current and historical. As noted in "The Foreward":
"It is our conviction that bringing these concepts and choices to your attention
will help you take control of the process of becoming the best teacher possible
... whether you are new to teaching or quite experienced, we know that your
teaching will be more effective once you become aware of the conceptual
framework around which your personal teaching style is built."
Concepts And Choices For Teaching
contains several real-life vignettes of teachers demonstrating each concept
discussed. You'll find a diverse collection of ideas and strategies which have
proven useful over time and in a wide variety of settings.
Trigwell, K. (1995)
"Increasing Faculty Understanding Of Teaching," in A. Wright et al, eds.,
Teaching Improvement Practices: Successful Strategies For Higher Education
(pp. 76-100). Bolton, MA.: Anker Publishing Company, Inc.
Trigwell, K., and M.
Prosser. (1996) "Changing Approaches to Teaching: A Relational Perspective."
Studies In Higher Education, 21: 275-284.
Trigwell, K., M. Prosser
and P. Taylor. (1994) "Qualitative Differences In Approaches To Teaching
First
Year
University Science." Higher Education,
27: 75-84.
Bibliography of studies using or
conceptually related to the
Approaches to Studying Inventory (ASI),
Revised Approaches to Studying
Inventory (RASI),
Approaches and Study Skills Inventory
for Students (ASSIST)
Approaches
to Studying Inventory (ASI)
Abouserie, R.
(1995). Self-esteem and achievement motivation as determinants of students’
approaches to studying. Studies in Higher Education, 20, 19-26.
Arnold, L., and
Feighny, K.M. (1995). Students’ general learning approaches and performances in
medical school: a longitudinal study. Academic Medicine, 70, 715-722.
Beckwith, J.B.
(1991). Approaches to learning, their context and relationship to assessment
performance. Higher Education, 22, 17-30.
Biggs, J.B.
(1987). Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Melbourne, Vic:
Australian Council for Educational Research.
Biggs, J.B.
(1988). Assessing student approaches to learning. Australian Psychologist,
23, 197-206.
Biggs, J.B.
(1993). What do inventories of student learning processes really measure: a
theoretical review and clarification. British Journal of Educational
Psychology, 63, 3-19.
Biggs, J.B.
(1994). Approaches to learning: nature and measurement of. The International
Encyclopedia of Education, 1, (2nd. edn.), Oxford: Pergamon Press, 319-322.
Biggs, J.G., and
Rihn, B.A. (1984). The effects of intervention on deep and surface approaches to
learning. In I. Kirby, (ed.), Cognitive Strategies and Educational
Performance. Orlando: Academic Press.
Blundell, S.
(1995). Should we always be aiming to promote deep approaches to learning? An
evaluation of the ISL questionnaire in practice. In G. Gibbs, (ed.),
Improving Student Learning: Through Assessment and Evaluation. Oxford:
Oxford Brookes
University, Oxford
Centre for Staff Development, 257-279.
Calder, I. (1989).
The Study and Learning Strategies of Students in
New Zealand Tertiary Institution.
Unpublished PhD thesis, University of
Waikato:
Waikato,
New Zealand.
Cano-Garcia, F.,
and Justicia-Justicia, F. (1994). Learning strategies, styles and approaches: an
analysis of their interrelationships. Higher Education, 27, 239-260.
Clarke, R.M.
(1986). Students’ approaches to learning in an innovative medical school: a
cross-sectional study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 56,
309-321.
Coles, C.R.
(1985). Differences between conventional and problem-based curricula in their
students’ approaches to studying. Medical Education, 19, 308-309.
Cuthbert, K.
(1995). Student project work in relation to a meaning oriented approach to
learning. In G. Gibbs, (ed.), Improving Student Learning: Through Assessment
and Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford
Brookes University,
Oxford
Centre for Staff Development, 245-256.
Eley, M.G. (1992).
Differential adoption of study approaches within individual students. Higher
Education, 23, 231-254.
Emilia, O., and
Mulholland, H. (1991). Approaches to learning of students in an Indonesian
medical school. Medical Education, 25, 462-470.
Entwistle, N. J.
(1982). Learning from the Student’s Perspective. Vernon-Wall Lecture.
Leicester: British Psychological
Society.
Entwistle, N.J.
(1985). Learning from the experience of studying. In H. Francis, (ed.),
Learning to Teach: Psychology in Teacher Training. London: Falmer.
Entwistle, N.J.
(1987). A model of the teaching-learning process. In J.T.E. Richardson, M.W.
Eysenck and D. Warren Piper, (eds.), Student Learning: Research in Education
and Cognitive Psychology. Milton Keynes: SRHE and Open University Press,
13-28.
Entwistle, N.J.
(1988). Motivational factors in students’ approaches to learning. In R.R.
Schmeck, (ed.), Learning Strategies and Learning Styles. New York: Plenum
Press, 21-51.
Entwistle, N.J.
(1988). From study skills to metacognitive awareness. In H.M.C. Schellekens,
P.R.J. Simons and J.E.L. Costongs, (eds.), Rendementsverbetering en
Studiebegeleiding. Tilburg:
Katholieke Universiteit Brabant.
Entwistle, N.J.
(1991). How students learn and why they fail. In J. Radford, (ed.), Talent,
Teaching and Achievement. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Entwistle, N.J.
(1991). Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment.
Special Issue of Higher Education, 22, 201-204.
Entwistle, N.J.
(1992). Influences on the quality of student learning: implications for medical
education. South African Medical Journal, 81, 596-606.
Entwistle, N.J.
(1994). The use of research on student learning in quality assessment. In
G.Gibbs, (ed.), Improving Student Learning: Through Assessment and
Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford Brookes
University, Oxford
Centre for Staff Development.
Entwistle, N.J.
(1996). Identifying students at risk through ineffective study strategies.
Higher Education, 31, 97-116.
Entwistle, N.J.
(1997). Contrasting perspectives on learning. In F. Marton, D.J. Hounsell and
N.J. Entwistle, (eds.), The Experience of Learning. (2nd. edn.),
Edinburgh:
Scottish Academic Press.
Entwistle, N.J.
(1998). Approaches to learning and forms of understanding. In B.C. Dart and G.M.
Boulton-Lewis, (eds.), Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.
Melbourne, Vic: Australian Council for Educational Research, 72-101.
Entwistle, N.J.
(1998). Understanding academic performance at university: a research
retrospective. In D. Shorrocks-Taylor and V. Varma, (eds.), Directions in
Educational Psychology. London: Whurr.
Entwistle, N.J.
(1998). Improving teaching through research on student learning. In
J.J.F.
Forest, (ed.), University Teaching: International Perspectives. New York:
Garland.
Entwistle, N.J.
(1998). Motivation and approaches to studying: motivating and conceptions of
teaching. In G.Thompson, S. Armstrong and S. Brown, (eds.), Motivating
Students. London: Kogan Page.
Entwistle, N.J.
(1998). Supporting students’ frameworks for conceptual understanding: knowledge
objects and their implications. In C. Rust, (ed.), Improving Student
Learning: Improving Students as Learners. Oxford: Oxford
Brookes
University, Oxford
Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
Entwistle, N.J.
(1999). Approaches to studying and levels of understanding: the influences of
teaching and assessment. In J.C. Smart, (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of
Theory and Research (xv). New York: Agathon Press.
Entwistle, N.J.
(in press). Conceptions, styles and approaches within higher education: analytic
abstractions and everyday experience. In R. Sternberg and L-F. Zhang, (eds.),
Perspectives on Cognitive, Learning, and Thinking Styles. Mahwah, N.J.:
Erlbaum.
Entwistle, N.J.,
and Entwistle, A.C. (1997). Revision and the experience of understanding. In F.
Marton, D.J. Hounsell and N.J. Entwistle, (eds.), The Experience of Learning.
(2nd. edn.), Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
Entwistle, N.J.,
Hanley, M., and Hounsell, D. (1979). Identifying distinctive approaches to
studying. Higher Education, 8, 365-380.
Entwistle, N.J.,
Hanley, M., and Ratcliffe, G. (1979). Approaches to learning and levels of
understanding. British Educational Research Journal, 5, 99-114.
Entwistle, N.J.,
Hounsell, D., Macaulay, C., Situnayake, G., and Tait, H. (1989). The
Performance of Electrical Engineering Students in Scottish Higher Education.
Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh,
Centre for Research on Learning and Instruction.
Entwistle, N.J.,
Marton, F., and Hounsell, D.J. (eds.), (1997). The Experience of Learning.
(2nd edn.), Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
Entwistle, N.J.,
and Meyer, J.H.F. (1992). Findings and implications from research on student
learning. South African Medical Journal, 81, 593-595.
Entwistle, N.J.,
Meyer, J.H.F., and Tait, H. (1991). Student failure: disintegrated perceptions
of studying and the learning environment. Higher Education, 21, 249-261.
Entwistle, N.J.,
and Napuk, S. (1997). Mind Maps and Knowledge Objects. Organising and
Explaining Understanding in Essays and Examinations. Research Report.
Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh,
Centre for Research on Learning and Instruction.
Entwistle, N.J.,
and Newble, D.I. (1986). Learning styles and approaches: implications for
medical education. Medical Education, 20, 162-175.
Entwistle, N.J.,
and Ramsden, P. (1981). Effects of academic departments on students’ approaches
to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 368-383.
Entwistle, N.J.,
and Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding Student Learning. London: Croom
Helm.
Entwistle, N.J.,
and Tait, H. (1990). Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and
preferences for contrasting academic environments. Higher Education, 19,
169-194.
Entwistle, N.J.,
and Tait, H. (1994). Approaches to studying and preferences for teaching in
higher education. Instructional Evaluation and Faculty Development, 14,
2-10.
Entwistle, N.J.,
Tait, H., and Entwistle, A.C. (1992). Academic understanding and contexts to
enhance it: a perspective from research on student learning. In T. Duffy and D.
Jonassen, (eds.), The Design of Constructivist Learning Environments.
Berlin:
Springer-Verlag.
Entwistle, N.J.,
Wall, D., MacMillan, C., Tait, H., and Entwistle, D. (1991). Schools to
Higher Education: Bridging the Gap. Edinburgh: Scottish Office, Education
Dept., Research and Intelligence Unit.
Entwistle, N.J.,
and Waterston, S. (1988). Approaches to studying and levels of processing in
university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58,
258-265.
Fogarty, G.J., and
Taylor, J.A. (1997). Learning styles among mature-age students: some comments on
the Approaches to Studying Inventory (ASI-S). Higher Education Research and
Development, 16, 321-330.
Fyfe, W. (1995).
Learning environments and students’ perceptions of learning. In G. Gibbs, (ed.),
Improving Student Learning: Through Assessment and Evaluation. Oxford:
Oxford Brookes
University, Oxford
Centre for Staff Development, 342-356.
Gow, L., and
Kember, D. (1990). Does higher education promote independent learning? Higher
Education, 19, 307-322.
Hambleton, I.R.,
Foster, W.H., and Richardson, J.T.E. (1998). Improving student learning using
the personalised system of instruction. Higher Education, 35, 187-203.
Harper, G., and
Kember, D. (1986). Approaches to study of distance education students.
British Journal of Educational Technology, 17, 212-222.
Harper, G., and
Kember, D. (1989). Interpretation of factor analyses from the Approaches to
Studying Inventory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 66-74.
Hattie, J., Biggs,
J., and Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student
learning: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 99-136.
Hattie, J., and
Watkins, D. (1988). Preferred classroom environment and approach to learning.
British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 345-349.
Hayes, K., King,
E., and Richardson, J.T.E. (1997). Mature students in higher education: 3.
Approaches to studying in access students. Studies in Higher Education,
22, 19-31.
Hayes, K., and
Richardson, J.T.E. (1995). Gender, subject and context as determinants of
approaches to studying in higher education. Studies in Higher Education,
20, 215-221.
Kember, D. (1996).
The intention to both memorise and understand: another approach to learning?
Higher Education, 31, 341-354.
Kember, D., and
Gow, L. (1989). A model of student approaches to learning encompassing ways to
influence and change approaches. Instructional Science, 18, 263-288.
Kember, D., and
Gow, L. (1990). Cultural specificity of approaches to study. British Journal
of Educational Psychology, 60, 356-363.
Kember, D., and
Harper, G. (1987a). Approaches to studying research and its implications for the
quality of learning from distance education. Journal of Distance Education,
2, 15-30.
Kember, D., and
Harper, G. (1987). Implications for instruction arising from the relationship
between approaches to studying and academic outcomes. Instructional Science,
16, 35-46.
Kember, D., and
Leung, D.Y.P. (1998). Influences upon students’ perceptions of workload.
Educational Psychology, 18, 293-307.
Kember, D., Ng,
S., Tse, H., Wong, E.T.T., and Pomfret, M. (1996). An examination of the
interrelationships between workload, study time, learning approaches and
academic outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 21, 347-358.
Kember, D., Wong,
A., and Leung, D.Y.P. (1999). Reconsidering the dimensions of approaches to
learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 323-343.
Leiden, L.I.,
Crosby,
R.D., and Follmer, H. (1990). Assessing learning style inventories and how well
they predict academic performance. Academic Medicine, 65, 395-401.
Marshall, D.,
Summers, M., and Woolnough, B. (1999). Students’ conceptions of learning in an
engineering context. Higher Education, 38, 291-309.
Marton, F., and
Saljo, R. (1976a). On qualitative differences in learning: 1. Outcome and
process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.
Marton, F., and
Saljo, R. (1997). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D.J. Hounsell and N.J.
Entwistle, (eds.), The Experience of Learning. (2nd. edn.), Edinburgh:
Scottish Academic Press.
Meyer, J.H.F.
(1988). Student perceptions of learning context and approaches to studying.
South African Journal of Higher Education, 2, 73-82.
Meyer, J.H.F.
(1991). Study orchestration: the manifestation, interpretation and consequences
of contextualised approaches to studying. Higher Education, 22, 297-316.
Meyer, J.H.F.
(1996). Some aspects of the individual-difference modelling of causal
attribution. Higher Education, 31, 51-71.
Meyer, J.H.F.
(1998). A medley of individual differences. In B.C. Dart and G.M. Boulton-Lewis,
(eds.), Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Melbourne, Vic:
Australian Council for Educational Research, 42-71.
Meyer, J.H.F.
(2000). The modelling of dissonant study orchestrations in higher education.
European Journal of Psychology of Education, xv, 5-18.
Meyer, J.H.F.,
Cliff, A.F., and Dunne, T.T. (1994). Impressions of disadvantage: 2. Monitoring
and assisting the student at risk. Higher Education, 27, 95-117.
Meyer, J.H.F., and
Dunne, T.T. (1991). Study approaches of nursing students: effects of an extended
clinical context. Medical Education, 25, 497-516.
Meyer, J.H.F.,
Dunne, T.T., and Sass, A.R. (1992). Impressions of disadvantage: 1. School
versus university study orchestration and consequences for academic support.
Higher Education, 24, 291-316.
Meyer, J.H.F., and
Eley, M.G. (1999). The development of affective subscales to reflect variation
in students’ experiences of studying mathematics in higher education. Higher
Education, 37, 197-216.
Meyer, J.H.F., and
Muller, M.W. (1990a). Evaluating the quality of student learning: 1. An
unfolding analysis of the association between perceptions of learning context
and approaches to studying at an individual level. Studies in Higher
Education, 15, 131-154.
Meyer, J.H.F., and
Muller, M.W. (1990b). An unfolding analysis of the association between
perceptions of learning context and approaches to studying. South African
Journal of Higher Education, 4, 46-58.
Meyer, J.H.F., and
Parsons, P. (1989a). An empirical study of English- and Afrikaans-speaking
students’ approaches to studying. South African Journal of Higher Education,
3, 109-114.
Meyer, J.H.F., and
Parsons, P. (1989b). Approaches to studying and course perceptions using the
Lancaster Inventory: a comparative study. Studies in Higher Education,
14, 137-153.
Meyer, J.H.F., and
Parsons, P. (1996). An exploration of student learning in mathematics. Int.
Journal Math. Educ. Sci. Technol., 27, 741-751.
Meyer, J.H.F.,
Parsons, P., and Dunne, T.T. (1990a). Individual study orchestrations and their
association with learning outcome. Higher Education, 20, 67-89.
Meyer, J.H.F.,
Parsons, P., and Dunne, T.T. (1990b). Study orchestration and learning outcome:
evidence of association over time among disadvantaged students. Higher
Education, 20, 245-269.
Meyer, J.H.F., and
Sass, A.R. (1993). The impact of first year on the learning behaviour of
engineering students. International Journal of Engineering Education, 9,
209-217.
Meyer, J.H.F., and
Watson, R.M. (1991). Evaluating the quality of student learning: 2. Study
orchestration and the curriculum. Studies in Higher Education, 16,
251-257.
Miller, C.D.,
Finley, J., and McKinley,D.L. (1990). Learning approaches and motives: male and
female differences and implications for learning assistance programs. Journal
of College Student Development, 31, 147-154.
Morgan, A., Gibbs,
G., and Taylor, E. (1980). Students’ Approaches to Studying the Social
Science and Technology Foundation Courses: Preliminary Studies. Study
Methods Group Report no. 4. Milton Keynes: Open University, Institute of
Educational Technology. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 197 639).
Morgan, A.,
Taylor, E., and Gibbs, G. (1982). Variations in students’ approaches to
studying. British Journal of Educational Technology, 13, 107-113.
Murray-Harvey, R.
(1994). Learning styles and approaches to learning: distinguishing between
concepts and instruments. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64,
373-388.
Newble, D.I., and
Clarke, R.M. (1986). The approaches to learning of students in a traditional and
in an innovative problem based medical school. Medical Education, 20,
267-273.
Newble, D.I., and
Clarke, R.M. (1987). Approaches to learning in a traditional and an innovative
medical school. In J.T.E. Richardson, M.W. Eyesenck and D. Warren Piper, (eds.),
Student Learning: Research in Education and Cognitive Psychology. Milton
Keynes: SRHE and Open University Press, 39-46.
Newble, D.I., and
Entwistle,
N.J. (1986). Learning styles and approaches:
implications for medical education. Medical Education, 20, 162-175.
Newble, D.I.,
Entwistle,
N.J., Hejka, E.J., Jolly, B.C., and Whelan, G.
(1988). Towards the identification of student learning-problems: the development
of a diagnostic inventory. Medical Education, 22, 518-526.
Newble, D.I., and
Gordon, M.I. (1985). The learning style of medical students. Medical
Education, 19, 3-8.
Newstead, S.E.
(1992). A study of two quick and easy methods of assessing individual
differences in student learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology,
62, 299-312.
Nuy, H.J.P.
(1991). Interactions of study orientation and students’ appreciation of
structure in their educational environment. Higher Education, 22,
267-274.
Parsons, P.
(1988). The Lancaster Approaches to Studying Inventory and Course Perceptions
Questionnaire: a replicated study at the Cape
Technikon. South African Journal of
Higher Education, 2, 103-111.
Parsons, P., and
Meyer, J.H.F. (1990). The academically at risk student: a pilot intervention
program and its observed effects on learning outcome. Higher Education,
20, 323-334.
Prosser, M., and
Trigwell, K. (1990). Student evaluations of teaching and courses: student study
strategies as a criterion of validity. Higher Education, 20, 135-142.
Provost, S.C., and
Bond, N.W. (1997). Approaches to studying and academic performance in a
traditional psychology course. Higher Education Research and Development,
16, 309-320.
Ramsden, P.
(1981). A Study of the Relationship Between Student Learning and its Academic
Context. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of
Lancaster:
Lancaster.
Ramsden, P., and
Entwistle,
N.J. (1981). Effects of academic departments on
students’ approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology,
51, 368-383.
Richardson, J.T.E.
(1990). Reliability and replicability of the Approaches to Studying
Questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 15, 155-168.
Richardson, J.T.E.
(1992). A critical evaluation of the short form of the Approaches to Studying
Inventory. Psychology Teaching Review, 1, 34-45.
Richardson, J.T.E.
(1993). Gender differences in responses to the Approaches to Studying Inventory.
Studies in Higher Education, 18, 3-13.
Richardson, J.T.E.
(1994a). Cultural specificity of approaches to studying in higher education: a
literature survey. Higher Education, 27, 449-468.
Richardson, J.T.E.
(1994b). Mature students in higher education: 1. A literature survey on
approaches to studying. Studies in Higher Education, 19, 309-325.
Richardson, J.T.E.
(1995a). Cultural specificity of approaches to studying in higher education: a
comparative investigation using the Approaches to Studying Inventory.
Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 2, 300-308.
Richardson, J.T.E.
(1995b). Mature students in higher education: 2. An investigation of approaches
to studying and academic performance. Studies in Higher Education, 20,
5-17.
Richardson, J.T.E.
(1995). Using questionnaires to evaluate student learning. In G. Gibbs, (ed.),
Improving Student Learning: Through Assessment and Evaluation. Oxford:
Oxford Brookes
University, Oxford
Centre for Staff Development, 499-524.
Richardson, J.T.E.
(1997) Meaning orientation and reproducing orientation: a typology of approaches
to studying in higher education? Educational Psychology, 17, 301-311.
Richardson, J.T.E.
(1998). Approaches to studying in undergraduate and post-graduate students.
Studies in Higher Education, 23, 217-220.
Richardson, J.T.E.
(2000). Researching Student Learning: Approaches to Studying in Campus-based
and Distance Learning. Buckingham: SHRE and Open University Press.
Richardson, J.T.E.,
and King, E. (1991). Gender differences in the
experience of
higher education: quantitative and qualitative approaches. Educational
Psychology, 11, 363-382.
Richardson, J.T.E.,
Landbeck, R., and Mugler, F. (1995). Approaches to studying in higher education:
a comparative study in the South Pacific. Educational Psychology, 15,
417-432.
Richardson, J.T.E.,
MacLeod-Gallinger, J., McKee, B.G., and Long, G.L. (2000). Approaches to
studying in deaf and hearing students in higher education. Journal of Deaf
Studies and Deaf Education, 5, 156-173.
Richardson, J.T.E.,
Morgan, A., and Woodley, A. (1999). Approaches to studying in distance
education. Higher Education, 37, 23-55.
Richardson, J.T.E.,
and Woodley, A. (1999). Approaches to studying in people with hearing loss.
British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 533-546.
Ropo, E. (1993).
Studying technology: an investigation of approaches to studying and perceptions
of teaching in a Finnish
University of technology. Higher Education, 25, 111-132.
Schmeck, R.R.
(1988). Individual differences and learning strategies. In C.E. Weinstein, E.T.
Goetz and P.A. Alexander, (eds.), Learning and Study Strategies: Issues in
Assessment, Instruction, and Evaluation. San Diego,
CA: Academic Press, 171-191.
Schmeck, R.R., and
Geisler-Brenstein, E. (1989). Individual differences that affect the way
students approach learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 1,
85-124.
Scouller, K.
(1998). The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches:
multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher
Education, 35, 453-472.
Scouller, K., and
Prosser, M. (1994). Students’ experiences in studying for multiple-choice
question examinations. Studies in Higher Education, 19, 267-279.
Severiens, S.E.,
and Tendam, G.T.M. (1994). Gender differences in learning styles: a narrative
review and quantitative meta-analysis. Higher Education, 27, 487-501.
Severiens, S.E.,
and Tendam, G.T.M. (1998). A multilevel meta-analysis of gender differences in
learning orientations. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68,
595-608.
Sharma, D.S.
(1997). Accounting students’ learning conceptions, approaches to learning and
the influence of the learning-teaching context on approaches to learning.
Accounting Education, 6, 125-146.
Sobral, D.T.
(1997). Improving learning skills: a self-help group approach. Higher
Education, 33, 39-50.
Solomonides, I.,
and Swannell, M. (1995). Can students learn to change their approach to study?
In G. Gibbs, (ed.), Improving Student Learning: Through Assessment and
Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford Brookes
University, Oxford
Centre for Staff Development, 371-385.
Speth, C., and
Brown, R. (1988). Study approaches, processes and strategies: are three
perspectives better than one? British Journal of Educational Psychology,
58, 247-257.
Speth, C., and
Brown, R. (1990). Effects of college students’ learning styles and gender on
their test preparation strategies. Applied and Cognitive Psychology, 4,
189-202.
Stiernborg, M.,
and Bandaranayake, R.C. (1996). Medical students’ approaches to studying.
Medical Teacher, 18, 229-236.
Stiernborg, M.,
Guy, J., and Tinker, R. (1997). Nursing students’ approaches to studying.
Nurse Education Today, 17, 121-127.
Sutherland, P.
(1995). An investigation into Entwistlean adult learning styles in mature
students. Educational Psychology, 15, 3, 257-270.
Tait, H., Speth,
C., and Entwistle, N.J. (1995). Identifying and advising students with deficient
study skills and strategies. In G. Gibbs, (ed.), Improving Student Learning:
Through Assessment and Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford
Brookes
University, Oxford
Centre for Staff Development, 323-332.
Tan, C.M., and
Thanaraj, K. (1993). Influence of context and preferred learning environments:
approaches to studying physiology. Medical Education, 27, 143-159.
Thomas, P. (1986).
The Structures and Stability of Learning Approaches. Unpublished PhD
thesis, University of Queensland:
Queensland, Australia.
Thomas, P., and
Bain, J.D. (1982). Consistency in learning strategies. Higher Education,
11, 249-259.
Thomas, P., and
Bain, J.D. (1984). Contextual dependence of learning approaches: the effects of
assessments. Human Learning, 3, 227-240.
Thomson, K., and
Falchikov, N. (1998). ‘Full on until the sun comes out!’: the effects of
assessment on student approaches to studying. Assessment and Evaluation in
Higher Education, 23, 379-390.
Trigwell, K., and
Prosser, M. (1991). Relating learning approaches, perceptions of context and
learning outcomes. Higher Educaton, 22, 251-266.
Trigwell, K., and
Prosser, M. (1991a). Relating approaches to study and the quality of learning
outcomes at course level at the course level. British Journal of Educational
Psychology, 61, 265-275.
Trigwell, K., and
Prosser, M. (1991b). Improving the quality of student learning: the influence of
learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes.
Higher Education, 22, 251-266.
Trigwell, K.,
Prosser, M., and Waterhouse, F. (1998). Relations between teachers’ approaches
to teaching and students approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37,
57-70.
Tynjala, P.
(1997). Developing education students’ conceptions of the learning process in
different learning environments. Learning and Instruction, 7, 277-292.
Van Langenberghe,
H.V.K. (1988). Evaluation of students’ approaches to studying in a problem-based
physical therapy curriculum. Physical Therapy, 68, 522-527.
Watkins, D.
(1998). Assessing approaches to learning: a cross-cultural perspective. In B.C.
Dart and G.M. Boulton-Lewis, (eds.), Teaching and Learning in Higher
Education. Melbourne, Vic: Australian Council for Educational Research,
124-144.
Watkins, D., and
Hattie, J. (1985). A longitudinal study of the approaches to learning of
Australian tertiary students. Human Learning, 4, 127-141.
Watkins, D.,
Hattie, J., and Astilla, E. (1986). Approaches to studying by Filipino students:
a longitudinal investigation. British Journal of Educational Psychology,
56, 357-362.
Watkins, D., and
Regmi, M. (1996). Towards the cross-cultural validation of a Western model of
student approaches to learning. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27,
547-560.
Webb, G. (1997).
Deconstructing deep and surface: towards a critique of phenomenography.
Higher Education, 33, 195-212.
Wilding, J., and
Hayes, S. (1992). Relations between approaches to studying and note-taking
behaviour in lectures. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 233-246.
Wilson, K.L.,
Smart, R.M., and Watson, R.J. (1996). Gender differences in approaches to
learning in first year psychology students. British Journal of Educational
Psychology, 66, 59-71.
Wong, S-L. (1992).
Approaches to study of distance education students. Research in Distance
Education, 4, (3), 11-17.
Revised
Approaches to Studying Inventory (RASI)
Duff, A. (1997). A
note on the reliability and validity of a 30-item version of Entwistle and
Tait’s Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory. British Journal of
Educational Psychology, 67, 529-539.
Entwistle, N.J.,
and Tait, H. (1994). The Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory.
Edinburgh:
University of Edinburgh,
Centre for Research into Learning and Instruction.
Richardson, J.T.E.
(1995). Using questionnaires to evaluate student learning. In G. Gibbs, (ed.),
Improving Student Learning: Through Assessment and Evaluation. Oxford:
Oxford Brookes
University, Oxford
Centre for Staff Development, 499-524.
Richardson, J.T.E.
(2000). Researching Student Learning: Approaches to Studying in Campus-based
and Distance Learning. Buckingham: SHRE and Open University Press.
Sadler Smith, E.
(1996). Approaches to studying: age, gender and academic performance.
Educational Studies, 22, 367-379.
Sadler Smith, E.
(1999). Intuition-analysis style and approaches to studying. Educational
Studies, 25, 159-173.
Sadler Smith, E.,
and Tsang, T. (1998). A comparative study of approaches to studying in Hong Kong
and the United Kingdom.
British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 81-93.
Tait, H., and
Entwistle,
N.J. (1996). Identifying students at risk
through ineffective study strategies. Higher Education, 31, 97-116.
Waugh, R.F.
(1999). Approaches to studying for students in higher education: a Rasch
measurement model analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology,
69, 63-79.
Waugh, R.F., and
Addison, P.A. (1998). A Rasch measurement model analysis of the Revised
Approaches to Studying Inventory. British Journal of Educational Psychology,
68, 95-112.
Approaches
and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST)
Aaron, S., and
Skakun, E. (1999). Correlation of students’ characteristics with their learning
styles as they begin medical school. Academic Medicine, 74, 260-262.
Entwistle, N.J.,
Tait, H., and McCune, V. (2000). Patterns of response to an Approaches to
Studying Inventory across contrasting groups and contexts. European Journal
of the Psychology of Education, 15, 33-48.
Long, W.F., and
Kiger, A. (2000). Dissonance in the Study Approaches of University Students.
Research Paper 2. Aberdeen: University of
Aberdeen,
Centre for Educational Research.
McCune, V. (1998).
Academic development during the first year at university. In C. Rust, (ed.),
Improving Student Learning: Improving Students as Learners. Oxford: Oxford
Brookes
University, Oxford
Centre for Staff and Learning Development, 354-358.
Mji, A. (1998).
Conceptions of learning: views of undergraduate mathematics students.
Psychological Reports, 83 (3, pt 1) 982.
Tait, H.,
Entwistle,
N.J., and McCune, V. (1997). ASSIST: a
reconceptualisation of the Approaches to Studying Inventory. In C. Rust, (ed.),
Improving Student Learning: Improving Students as Learners. Oxford:
Oxford Brookes
University, Oxford
Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
|
