Ferris State University

Center for Teaching, Learning & Faculty Development
Dealing with Disruptive Students
  The following information is a summary of the work of Arthur Levine and Jeanette Cureton from the book When Hope and Fear Collide, 1998. This work is considered the foremost accounting of college students’ attitudes and behaviors in the 1990’s. Levine interviewed 9200 students, 270 Student Affairs Officer and did numerous focus group interviews at 28 different campuses across the country.

This information may help us to understand today’s college students and shed some light upon their behaviors that seem to be less civil than 10 year ago.

  • More and more students describe themselves in terms of their differences with others and not their commonalties.
  • There is a wide spread sense of victimization on the part of students.
  • Students are more socially isolated, have less time for social life and are afraid of getting hurt in relationships.
  • Today’s students are simple more damaged psychologically by the time they get to college than at any other time in history.
  • Students confuse hard work with being intellectual—if I work hard I should do well because working hard is all that is needed to succeed.
  • High schools grades are now at the highest level ever reported—so are college grades—at the same time remediation is at its highest level ever in college.
  • A great mismatch exists between instructors/professor’s teaching style and students’ learning style—this often leads to frustration.

Students like learning that is

  • Direct concrete experiences
  • Moderate to high structure
  • Linear approach
  • Practical and immediate

Faculty prefer

  • Global to the particular
  • Concepts, abstractions and ideas
  • Feel students need autonomy to learn

These differences cause faculty to see students as less and less well prepared—while students think faculty are poor teachers and their courses are incomprehensible.

Ironically, satisfaction with college has never been higher.

National survey 9200 students—270 Chief student affairs officers 1993-1997(When Hope and Fear Collide Arthur Levine.

  1. Civility has declined. 57% said yes
  2. Ethnic groups don’t socialize with those outside their group. 56% said yes
  3. Sexual harassment up. 55% said yes

Also students’ feel uncomfortable to express unpopular views or controversial opinions—they don’t want to talk about gender, race, and ethnicity issues.

More trouble between student groups at residential campuses where there is more opportunity for students to interact.

Victimization

Students see themselves as victims at all levels

Example -- Rich students’ say they pay more so poor kids can get scholarships.

Poor students complain rich kids get into schools/programs because they are rich not because they are qualified.

Majority students see minority students getting unfair advantages --same for men and women --they say they are treated unfairly and others profit at their expense.

All of this victim thinking coupled with a preoccupation with differences can cause reactions and over reactions to things that might have been ignored before.

Students have "hair triggers" where issues of difference are concerned whether they are real or imagined.

Students’ Worries

  1. Worry about becoming victims of violent crime 46%
  2. Paying tuition—completing college one/third grew up with one or no parents
  3. Students are showing up overwhelmed and more damaged—use of counseling services hitting record numbers—60% of colleges report.
  4. Students bring many more non-academic issues with them then at any time before—today’s students are described as having a leaking lifeboat mentality—just focus on bailing and on nothing else and no one else.

Why do they go to College?

Feel there is no other path to financial success--The goals of using college to help

  1. learn to get along with others and

  2. formulate values and goals for their life

have become the lowest 2 goals on the lists of reasons to attend college.

They attend to make money and find a career.

Other Characteristics of Importance

  • 60% work—24% work full-time
  • 87% percent of the students asked said that they worked hard at college (49% said this in 1969).
  • 83% considered themselves intellectual—(64% in 1976) even though they reject learning for the sake of learning and self-exploration.
  • Students see time spent = to achievement. They make no distinction between quality and quantity in learning.
  • In general faculty are astounded by their students lack of knowledge—only 25% say their students are well prepared—less than 50% says their students are even satisfactorily prepared.

Students today are not certain that they can do good for their fellow humans and still do well for themselves.

The market place wants students to have the 3C’s

  • Critical Thinking
  • Continuous Learning Initiative
  • Creativity

Ways of Dealing with Disruptive Students

  1. Never attribute to malice what can be attributed to ignorance (V. Ruggerio)—most of the time students are not trying to be malicious and often are not aware that they are being disruptive.

  2. More traditionally aged students exhibit behaviors that were acceptable in high school or at least went uncorrected. They are often surprised that college teachers are bothered by these behaviors.

  3. See all conflicts as an opportunity to educate the student(s) involved.

  4. If at all possible deal with any significant issues of disruption or disagreement in private (your office with the door open). Dealing with an issue in front of others can cause both the students and the instructor to be affected. You don’t need others taking sides.

  5. Use I statements to address the concern …this way you are owning the problem and giving the student an easy opportunity to save face and get back on task. I statements avoid the issuance of consequences. " I would appreciate it if your would …"

  6. Stay calm-- at all cost stay calm—if necessary declare a cooling off period.

  7. Put yourself in the student’s shoes—try to see what is the motivation behind the disruption/problem/ issue.

  8. Listen carefully—ask clarifying questions that help to define the issue. " I want to make certain that I understand what you are saying is this what you mean"

  9. Think win-win. Ask the students how they would resolve the issue—this will give them some ownership. Also ask how they would handle the situation if they were the instructor.

  10. Make certain that your position is clearly defensible.

  11. Avoid the introduction of side issues. Keep bringing the student back to the issue at hand. Other issues can be dealt with at another time.

  12. Write down the issue/concern/problem

  13. Write down the solution/agreement.

  14. Be as consistent as you can in how you handle each individual occurrence. This includes how you handle even small disruptions in class. Students really take note of inconsistencies in this area.

  15. Offer the student the option of taking the issue to the next level. Tell him/her who to talk to and where they can find them.

  16. Keep notes on the conversation(s) that you have with the student. This will help to protect you and make it clear to the students that you want an accurate record of the interaction(s) you have with them.


Faculty wanting further information about any of these topics are encouraged to contact Terry Doyle at doylet@ferris.edu



Check back for updates!
Website comments?  Contact danielsl@ferris.edu

 


CTLFD Home FSU Home Intranet Search